Court judgments

EU judgments

No results found

UK judgments

No results found

US judgments

No results found

EU Member States judgments

No results found

Other judgments

No results found

Arbitration guidance

Licensing

UK

 

Guidance on sanctions in arbitration

 

International Chamber of Commerce

 

London Court of International Arbitration

 

Vienna International Arbitral Centre

 

Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre

 

Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Institute

 

Russian Arbitration Association

 

Russian laws on arbitration

  • Federal Law No. 382-FZ “On Arbitration (Arbitration Proceedings) in the Russian Federation
  • Amended by Federal Law No. 531-FZ (December 2018)
  • English translation by the Russian Arbitration Centre

There are four foreign arbitral institutions recognised as permanent arbitral institutions (PAI) under these laws:

  • The Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) – Notice;
  • The Vienna International Arbitral Centre (VIAC) – Notice;
  • The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) – Notice; and
  • The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) – Notice.

PAI status allows arbitral institutions to administer arbitration in Russia, per Federal Law No. 382-FZ “On Arbitration (Arbitration Proceedings).

 

EU court requests for preliminary rulings

What are requests for preliminary rulings?

Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) allows and sometimes requires courts in EU Member States to refer questions on the interpretation of EU law to the European Court of Justice, which are then applied by the referring court. These are called requests for preliminary rulings. In a sanctions context, the requests relate to the interpretation of EU sanctions regulations. The requests are composed of a series of questions which the referring court would like the ECJ to answer.

Sanctions-related requests for preliminary rulings

[table id=1 /]

Footer